This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
Что думаешь? Оцени!
Brit Awards 2026: Full list of nominees，详情可参考旺商聊官方下载
AI 原生营销服务全年收入同比增长 301%；，推荐阅读safew官方下载获取更多信息
leftArr[i] = arr[left + i];，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition